{"blyg":"0.3","id":"03ysc0xy29cc7khqeatbaq598p","kind":"thread","origin":"https://blyg.protocol-institute.org/","page":"t/03ysc0xy29cc7khqeatbaq598p/","author":{"name":"Editor","url":"https://blyg.protocol-institute.org/"},"created":"2026-09-24T16:44:14Z","updated":"2026-09-24T23:13:21Z","version":2,"content_md":"Running list of short notes from the Protocol Symposium.\n\n![[3qj1453h8nbp3jne4xe341bx4g]]\n![[14mw923edr7gvcwxwnwv1eh1nr]]\n![[0s5hva1bz0k21ewtr5bsm7vyac]]\nDan Schmidt on mazes vs. protocols: one hides the path, the other publishes it — and the real question is telling which you're in.\n","content_html":"

Running list of short notes from the Protocol Symposium.

\n\n
\n

Great idea from Sean Stevenson's talk at Protocol Symposium -- the test of New Nature should be that there is nobody to appeal to in a complex system.

\n\n
\n
\n

The Polina talk was a definite vibe vacation to the Russian internet. A view of protocolized realities that are much more strongly shaped by material conditions than in the west.

\n\n
\n
\n

Florian Lohse's talk on the idea of "time moves down the stack" suggests a general way of conceptualizing stacks: infrastructure --> structure --> superstructure --> vivistructure.

\n\n
\n

Dan Schmidt on mazes vs. protocols: one hides the path, the other publishes it — and the real question is telling which you're in.

\n","content_hash":"sha256:7776739dda83329433b56a26a6ecf83d10f98830a5124a88d8b4488812570d26","media":[],"transclusions":[{"id":"3qj1453h8nbp3jne4xe341bx4g","version":2},{"id":"14mw923edr7gvcwxwnwv1eh1nr","version":1},{"id":"0s5hva1bz0k21ewtr5bsm7vyac","version":1}],"generated":[{"sources":[{"id":"22zv3xxsyg44nhxbtkcg21rg6a","version":3}],"model":"claude-opus-5","at":"2026-09-24T23:13:11Z"}],"changelog":[{"version":1,"at":"2026-09-24T16:45:26Z","note":null,"pinned":true},{"version":2,"at":"2026-09-24T23:13:21Z","note":null,"pinned":true}]}